NCLT
Landmark Judgments IBC -upto 2023
| Section-wise Jurisprudence on IBC (up to 30 Sept 2020) |
Supreme Court
NCLAT Delhi holds that Non-Reply to Demand Notice under Section 8 does not preclude the Corporate Debtor to bring relevant materials establish that there are pre-existing disputes
By Saurabh Gandhi
Case:
M/s. Brand Realty Services Ltd. Versus M/s. Sir John Bakeries India Pvt. Ltd.
Court/Tribunal:
National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi
Coram:
Justice Ashok Bhushan, Chairperson
Dr. Alok Srivastava, Member (Technical)
Counsel:
For Appellant: Mr. Pankaj Agarwal, Advocate.
For Respondent: Mr. Nishant Awana, Mr. Devansh Malhotra, Advocates
Date of order:
LEGAL ENVIRONMENT FOR DOING BUSINESS IN INDIA
Short book on LEGAL ENVIRONMENT FOR DOING BUSINESS IN INDIA
NCLT Delhi holds that Principal and Interest Amount Cannot Be Clubbed To Reach The Minimum Threshold of Rs. 1 Crore u/s 4 of IBC, 2016.
Title: NCLT Delhi holds that Principal and Interest Amount Cannot Be Clubbed To Reach The Minimum Threshold of Rs. 1 Crore u/s 4 of IBC, 2016.
by Saurabh Gandhi
Case:
CBRE South Asia Private Limited Versus M/s. United Concepts and Solutions Private Limited.
Court/Tribunal:
National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Bench (Court-II)
Coram:
Sh. Abni Ranjan Kumar Sinha, Hon’ble Member (J)
Sh. L.N. Gupta, Hon’ble Member (T)